|
The tip-sample forces and their control are the most important
issues of AFM, which has been recognized from the very first contact
mode applications. The experience of using this mode showed that
soft materials can be easy damaged because of the large normal force
and/or shearing deformation. And when a sample is rigid, imaging
in the contact mode may destroy a sharp tip apex.
Typically, the forces applied to samples in the contact mode are
in the range from tens to hundreds of nanoNewtons. Additionally,
most surfaces in air are covered by a layer of adsorbed water and
other contaminants, whose surface tension pulls the tip and probe
downwards. Electrostatic charges on the tip and sample can also
give rise to additional long-range forces and complicate the imaging.
It is difficult to judge in advance if the contact mode can be
applied for characterization of a particular sample. For this purpose,
measurements of the tip-sample normal forces are performed with
force curves (deflection-versus-distance relations). The examination
of force curves with probes of different stiffness can be useful
for defining the operation parameters and most appropriate probes
for imaging. The force curves help recognizing capillary forces
and adhesion, determining regions of attractive and repulsive tip-sample
forces, a range of forces (deflections) for tip-sample elastic deformation
as well as a tip-induced sample deformation and type of the latter
(elastic, inelastic, etc).
Besides the force curves, there are various practical procedures
to insure stable and controlled-force imaging. After the tip engagement
an operator might try lower set-point deflections to minimize the
tip-force, increase the feedback gains and optimize scanning rate
to make imaging stable. This is achieved when height contours in
the trace and retrace directions match each other and topographic
or height images are practically identical in consecutive scans.
Actually, the observed topography is not necessarily that of the
top most sample layer. It might happen that what is in the image
represents more rigid sub-layer morphology while the top layer is
removed by the tip. This guess can be checked by making a larger
scan at the same tip-force and imaging conditions. During scanning,
an effective tip-force and possible sample damage is also related
with the time the tip spent in the sample location. Therefore a
tip-damaged area is often seen as a "window" in the larger
scan. If such effect is found one should try a lower tip-force or
softer probe for imaging of the topmost layer.
If a sample allows imaging at different tip-sample forces, this
circumstance could be used for a compositional imaging in the contact
mode. Surface locations with different stiffness can be depressed
by the tip-force to dissimilar levels and, therefore, their contrast
in height or topography images will depend on imaging force.
At present, the contact mode has been mainly substituted by oscillatory
modes, which can be applied to broader range of materials. However,
in some applications the contact mode is still attractive due to
higher imaging speed compared to the oscillatory modes. Comparative
studies of some samples with both (contact and oscillatory) modes
could be beneficial for interpretation of their images and sample
characterization.
|