| |
|
|
| |

Probes and Cantilevers for SPM
Cantilever with the tip on its end is the main sensing component ultimately responsible for quality of AFM imaging. The most common and at the same time quite sensible scheme of data acquisition is that of an optical one based on registration of a laser beam reflected from the back side of the cantilever with the sectioned photodiode. For better reflection backside of cantilevers is usually covered with Aluminium. There are a number of other deflection registration techniques and related peculiarities of cantilever construction among which piezocantilevers are worth of particular consideration [160, 161, 210, 211, 390, 921, 922, 1382]. But we limit our report with description of cantilevers for optical registration scheme.
Cantilevers for optical registration can be distinguished with following parameters:
The most popular materials are monocrystalline silicon and Si 3N 4. Silicon nitride cantilevers offers advantage over silicon ones in the sense that they may be produced thinner and, hence, more flexible (having lower stiffness) but Si3N4 does not possess perfect manufacturability for tips machining, therefore Si3N4 tips are usually inferior to those made of silicon. Most recently, merits of both materials have been coupled together in hybrid probe construction, which features flexibility of silicon nitride lever and sharpness of silicon tip [ 1442]. Also cantilevers made of tungsten, nickel and another materials are in use worldwide [ 157, 581, 602, 870, 921, 922, 943, 1022, 1065, 1328]. Material through its inherent mechanical properties (elasticity module or Young's module E, module of rigidity G) and density defines stiffness, resonant frequency and Q-factor (see below). Also, material properties of the coating should be taken into consideration if it spreads over the whole cantilever surface. Using cantilevers made of low resistance material such as metals or highly doped silicon ensures that no electrostatic charges will collect at the tip apex. Gathering of electrostatic charges results in distortion of the images and is especially crucial in Scanning Tunneling and Electrical Force Microscopy studies.
A number of cantilever geometries were proposed since the invention of AFM and even earlier when Scanning Tunneling Microscopy was the only SPM technique of comparable principle of operation. The most preferable among researchers are rectangular thin bar and triangular lever forms. Triangular form often used in such contact mode experiments where twisting a tip along the only symmetry axis of the lever is undesirable. Range of geometries of the serial cantilevers manufactured by MikroMasch is rather wide:
| |
MikroMasch |
Data from publications reviewed |
| Length l, ?µm |
90 - 460 |
> 10 |
| Width w, ?µm |
35 - 60 |
> 3 |
| Thickness s, ?µm |
0.7 - 7.5 |
> 0.1 |
| Force constantk, N/m |
0.01 - 91 |
0.001 - 400 |
| Resonant frequency fo, kHz |
7 - 420 |
3 kHz ~ 10 Mhz | |
Stiffness is defined by force constant k measured in N/m (or sometimes nN/nm). Usually employed cantilevers possess force constants in the range of 0.01 - 100 N/m. The "soft" cantilevers which k is below 0.1 N/m are chosen mainly while using contact mode in order to affect the sample in minimal extent. The rigid ones with k>1 N/m are often used in non-contact or dynamic modes since they exhibit high resonant frequencies and small oscillation amplitudes of about several tens Angström. It provides wide dynamic frequency range and substantially raises sensitivity.
 |
 |
| |
|
| Fig. 1.1 Schematic of vertical deflection |
Fig. 1.2 Schematic of lateral deflection |
By default term "force constant" stands for that of determining rigidness of vertical deflection of the cantilever (Fig.1.1). Theoretical expression for estimation of this force constant in the case of the simplest rectangular cantilever is given by following formula:
In a number of SPM techniques especially in Lateral Force Microscopy (LFM) tip is moved in touch with the surface of the sample and twisting of the cantilever apart from vertical deflection also take place as depicted in Fig 1.2. Stiffness of the cantilever suffered from such kind of applied external force is determined by lateral force constant, which can differ from that of "normal" k at great extent. The formula for klat has the same structure but additional parameter of h defining tip height appears:

By additional processing of commercial cantilevers Kageshima et al. [1437] enhanced the lateral force sensitivity of Atomic Force Microscopy for detection of molecular scale interactions. Sensors of two types were fabricated by this group. As a result, the lateral force constants were reduced about 10-fold and 180-fold for both types respectivelly that allowed for improvement of lateral force resolution up to 1 nN. Expressions for determination of force constants of triangular levers are more complicated [1308]. See also a useful paper of Newmeister and Ducker [1218].
It is commonly adopted that triangular lever much better withstands lateral forces in comparison to rectangular one of identical normal stiffness. Rigorous calculations performed by Sader [2622] show that the reality is quite the contrary. This unexpected theoretical result is to be approved experimentally.
It is nontrivial task however to measure exactly the force constant of a particular cantilever mainly due to the fact that geometrical parameters of every cantilever cannot be exactly controlled and determined individually in mass production. Therefore, theoretically calculated stiffness may substantially differ from the real one. Especially it concerns of thickness control during the etching process of cantilever micromachining. Simple calculation shows that variation of thickness in ?±20% results in variation of k value in the range of about -50% ~ +70%. To cope with this unsertainty a number of empiric and semiempiric techniques of force constant measuring and calibration are developed [E008, 859, 1300, 1205, 1206, 1621, 2626]. MikroMasch produces a series of cantilevers with calibrated force constant. Calibration procedure is taken from paper of J. Sader et al. [1206]. Determination of mechanical properties of materials at micro and nanoscale needed for microprocessor design and development of micro-elecrtomechanical systems (MEMS) is a challenge due inadequate testing equipment since it must be capable of applying loads on the order of 10-6 to 10-9 Newtons. AFM with well-calibrated silicon cantilevers is quite promising technique for such measurements. Comella and Scanlon [756] report development of cantilever based technique for determination of elasticity of thin films. In their simple and reliable approach microcantilevers of material investigated are formed by ordinary lithographical method, then AFM silicon cantilever with well-calibrated force response is used to measure microbeams deflection under defined loadings. Authors claim that the method developed is applicable to beams of thickness ranging from Angströms to microns. Vice versa, using calibrated loading (for example, with indenter) one can measure unknown force constant of the AFM cantilever [E011]. Visit also Materials Research section and subsections within for numerous examples of materials characterization.
Resonant frequency fo varies from several kHz up to several Mhz [ 163] and analytically is expressed as:
where m and mtip are masses of a cantilever and a tip respectively. In the simplest case of rectangular cantilever neglecting with the tip mass one can derive:

It can be easily seen that the decisive factor to increase resonant frequency is to shorten the length of a cantilever. At the same time cantilever can be done rather "soft" by means of width or thickness adjustments compensating rise of force constant due to appearance of l in the denominator of the expression for k. The cantilevers with high resonant frequencies fo and low k are the better choice for tapping mode investigations since tip most gently tapping the surface oscillating at the same time with several hundred kilohertz [519, 1578]. Eigenfrequency of the cantilever can significantly vary if it is coated with rather thick coating like, for instance, DLC. Salvadori at al [85] investigated dependence of fo from the thickness of DLC coating deposited on the cantilevers of 3,5-5 ?µm thicknesses using a specially derived formula for a thin and uniform coating with thickness s. It was found to have almost linear fashion. The coating of about 0,3 ?µm raise eigenfrequency of cantilever by 50%. Although, deposition of thick DLC films results in severe bending of cantilever as shown in photographs presented by Lemoine at al [82]. This bending is originated from the intrinsic stress in DLC films. It can be released substantially by incorporating silicon atoms (~15%) in a-C:H film. But authors note that stress-induced cantilever deflections are too large for direct use of the cantilevers in an AFM microscope. Nevertheless, such a bending gave rise to works on stress measurements in thin films grown on silicon cantilever beams (see, for example, [1649]). Fritz et al. [1211] reported on the successful deposition of a thin copper film onto conductive silicon cantilevers of MikroMasch produce by means of galvanic displacement technique. This procedure did not lead to bending of the lever and kept the resonant frequency almost unchanged. To demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach for tribological studies, the coated cantilevers were chemically functionalized with alkanethiol monolayers. The effect of changed surface energy was detected with adhesion measurements in water and ethanol.
Q-factor shows a part of the whole vibration energy that system looses during a full cycle of oscillation. In other words, it defines minimal external vibration force within given range of frequencies needed to maintain oscillation of the system. Ideally, no external force is needed since it contributes to overall noise reducing sensitivity. In highly dumping ambients such as liquids substantial external forces are needed thus Q-factor is less than in ultrahigh vacuum in 2-3 order of magnitude. In mechanical systems it approximates as:
where b
is a damping factor. Thus Q-factor
depends upon mechanical characteristics of cantilever and damping properties
of ambient. The more is Q,
the more is sensitivity. See the recent publication on the theme by Yasumura
et al. [1210].
Tips in their turn can be characterized as follows:
The choice of the material depends upon the purposes
it is intended for. When the highest possible hardness is necessary, for example
in nanoscratching experiments or Scanning
Spreading Resistance Microscopy (SSRM), the cantilever is furnished
with diamond tip [ 602, 1606,
1609]. Another way is to use conventional tip
with diamond-like coating (DLC) [ 1336].
Resistance of the tip and the whole cantilever
against aggressive ambients especially in the case of fluids is of primary importance
as well. This problem is often solved using protective coatings such as Cr-Au,
Pt etc.
Protective coatings at the same time can serve
as conductive coatings. Besides, TiN, W 2C, TiO, doped DLC and many
others are used. Cantilevers with such tips are suitable for Scanning Tunneling
Microscopy (STM), Electric
Force Microscopy (EFM) and other conductance sensitive techniques. In
principle, silicon tip itself can be used for this purpose if made of highly
doped silicon. But it easily damaged in contact mode techniques such as mentioned
above SSRM where very high contact forces of 10-5 N
are applied to the specimen [157].
Another class of coatings includes magnetic ones
such as Co, Ni, Fe and a number of special alloys for use in Magnetic
Force Microscopy (MFM) and Scanning Tunneling Microscopy investigations
[ 642, 873, 1111,
1117, 1122,
1123, 1126,
1176, 1441].
You can choose those manufactured by MikroMasch here.
Since the midst 1990's a novel approach of functionalization
of usual tip apex with another molecules in order to build specific probes and
sensors is developing intensively. Till now a different micro-, macromolecules
and functionalization addenda was proposed and investigated as candidates for
supertips: carbon nanotubes [ 30, 78,
818, 1325, 1380,
1381, 1456,
1464, 1610-1620],
W 2C nanotubes [ 1445], proteins [ 974],
adamantane [ 270], caltrop shaped molecules based
on a differentially substituted tetrahedral silicon atom [ E009]
and many others [ 451, 1211, 1622-1631].
Besides inherent extrasharpness the functionalized tips possess selectivity
with respect to the features on the sample surface having different chemical
nature and ideally suit to map their distribution and perform single-molecule
force spectroscopy studies. Of course, to measure such tiny forces down to 10-12
N and gradients of 10-5 N/m quite sensible and
intelligent registration and feedback systems are necessary.
Functionalization of the tip apex with various
agents allows for preferential imaging of different atoms at the sample surface.
Ke et al. [ 13] investigated theoretically the effect
of tip morphology on the image contrast for a GaAs(110) surface for the three
atomically different tip apexes of a Si tip: (1) Si apex with a half-filled
dangling bond; (2) Ga apex with an empty dangling bond; and (3) As apex with
a fully filled dangling bond. The study revealed a great impact of the dangling-bond
states of different atoms at the tip apex on the image contrast. Calculation
revealed that the Ga apex will image the As sublattice, and the As apex will
image the Ga sublattice, and in the case of the Si apex, it is possible to image
only the As sublattice or both the As and Ga sublattices, depending on the tip-sample
separation.
These are height, profile, open
angle at the tip apex and apex curvature radius.
The overwhelming majority of former commercial
tips were of pyramidal triangular or square shape with opening angle up to 70?°
(Fig 2. a). They were produced by lithography method and didn't actually exhibit
sufficient sharpness.
Using (electro)chemical etching technique one
can produce sharper cantilevers from monocrystalline silicon. The bulk shape
of this tip is still pyramidal and not so sharp (<40?°, Fig 2. b) but the
very end of the tip tends to become more and more thinner as approaching to
the apex. The open angle near the apex is about 20?°. But pyramidal profile of
the cantilever does not still allow imaging of high aspect ratio structures.
If high aspect ratio samples having steep and
deep walls are to be investigated, you have to choose long and thin tip like
a bee STING
(Fig 2. c). Such tip is grown on the apex of the conventional tip using Electron
Beam Deposition (EBD) technique. Another techniques such as Focused Ion Beam
(FIB) machining [ 2594] or oriented growth of
whisker-like silicon needles [ 1281] are also
developed.
The latest advances in technology of carbon nanotubes
allow attachment or direct grow of carbon nanotube as an ideally possible whisker
at the tip apex of commercial cantilevers (Fig 2. e).
Resolution of Scanning Probe Microscopy depends
substantially on the sharpness of the imaging tip. Curvature radius of the conventional
tip is about 10-15 nm, that of the STING tip is about 5-7 nm. But the highest
possible resolution is achievable with HI'RES
tips specially developed by MikroMasch (Fig 2. d). Curvature radii of these
tips are of the order of 1 nm (!), so fine molecular or even atomic structure
can be resolved.
In some studies quite specific probe tips are required,
for example tips with flat apex (Fig 2. f). Such tips are used in tribological, indentation and other studies.
 |
 |
 |
| d |
e |
f |
|
| Fig. 2 Tip variety. (a) Probe with piramidal tip.
(b) Probe with conventional silicon tip. (c) Probe with EBD grown tip (STING).
(d) TEM image of HI'RES tip. (e) Probe with Carbon Nanotube tip.
Image taken from [1612] with permission of Dr. R. Schlaf. (f) Probe with flat tip apex.
| |
Sometimes there is no apparent dependence
between the tip characteristics and imaging parameters. For example, Sedin and
Rowlen [21] observed two different trends for measured
surface roughness as a function of tip size. Root mean squared (RMS) roughness
is one of the most commonly reported measures of surface roughness from AFM
images. It was found that at small lateral scan sizes (<500 nm) the image
root mean square roughness decreased as tip size increased, but at larger scan
sizes (e.g. 5000 nm), the roughness increased with increasing tip size. The
authors also emphasized that there is a great variation of tip shapes within
a single lot of commercial cantilevers. Frost et al. [27]
have shown that the tip quality has a strong influence on the surface roughness
parameters extracted from the AFM images particularly for surfaces with a low
surface roughness (~1 nm) as generally obtained by means of thin film technologies.
For evaluation of the influence of the actual AFM tip quality on the measured
surface topography they proposed nanometer-sized sputtered InP-structures which
sizes are well-controllable with a set of parameters of the sputtering process.
There were also attempts to estimate the effect
of tip apex size on AFM image using various simulation approaches [132,
698]. The material of the next paragraph is just
devoted to tip shape determination methods and related problems.
Ideally tip apex must be round shaped and terminate
with the single atom. Deviations from this ideal situation cause so-called tip
artifacts in the scanned images. A collection of tip induced artifacts is gathered
by Xu and Arnsdorf [1605]. 10 suggestions to
minimize artifacts in SPM images are proposed in [1010].
Artifacts also may be caused by either the microscope design and operation mode
or external environmental conditions, i.e. by factors not related to tip imperfectness
[1376]. Thorough description of commonly observed
artifacts in SPM as well as procedures for tip shape characterization are developed and published by The American Society for
Testing and Materials (ASTM) [2800, 2801].
There are a number of tip defects, which cause artifacts. The most common are:
a) Multiple peaks on the apex being atomic scale protrusions.
Every peak during scanning contributes in the tip-sample interaction. In the
simplest case of double peak apex the features on the sample surface look twin
in the scans (Fig 3d). Absence of this defect is especially crucial when measuring
single macromolecules
b) Flattened apex. This results in lowering of resolution power. The
sharpness of the apex tends to decrease during consecutive contact mode scans
of the sample surface (Fig 3 a,b,c).
c) Non-spheric apex. Results in geometry distortion of sample features.
 |
 |
| (a) 700 x 700 x 20 nm |
(b) 700 x 700 x 16 nm |
 |
 |
| (c) 800 x 800 x 12 nm |
(d) 400 x 400 x 16 nm |
Fig. 3. Imaging of sharp edges of CdF2 films grown
in <111> orientation.
a, b, c) Decreasing of tip sharpness in the set. d) Double tip artifact. Image courtesy of Prof. Sergey Gastev, St. Petersburg |
Actually, yield of cantilevers with "good" tips is rather far from 100% due to defects of one way or another including the most common mentioned above. Thus, development of a simple tip shape characterization technique is quite desirable. Moreover, during a few last years scanning probe techniques are considered as the means of choice for critical dimension metrology (CDM) applications [837, 1608, 1612], and the tip shape geometry becomes crucial factor of success.
Problem of tip-sample convolution. Methods of tip characterization.
Achieving the best possible resolution will always remain the outmost goal for many SPM studies. There are, though, some technical challenges to be overcome as well as fundamental limitations on the way to high resolution.
One of the technical issues we have to abide is the imperfect geometry and finite size of the tip. The best approximation to ideal tip geometry (omitting various natural disturbing factors like thermal noise) is believed to be carbon nanotube of several nanometers in diameter, several micrometers long and with the single atom at the sharp conical apex. The most of commercial cantilevers is too far from this idealization. In general, conventional tip is unable to penetrate high aspect ratio structures, to touch every point on the sample surface and to profile exactly surfaces with complex topography. So the finite size of the tip and its imperfectness contribute significantly to distortion of images.
There are also some physical restrictions in achieving subnanometer resolution besides technical issues. Due to long-range nature of Van der Waals forces acting between tip and sample, resulting force is determined by mean interaction of great number of atoms from both tip and sample surface especially when the features are comparable in size with tip apex. Therefore, features of the sample surface become diluted by this interaction of collective nature.
Thus, actually the image is a complex convolution of the tip and the surface shapes. This convolution is unavoidable but there are good chances to reconstruct rather true image from diluted one using special mathematical methods.
The earliest attempts to formulate the task mathematically date from papers of Reiss et al. [1633] and Keller [1634]. Their works became the basis for several similar methods of deconvolution where some simple particular geometries, e.g. spheres or parabolas were considered. These methods required intensive computation and evaluation of numerical derivatives and, therefore were comlicated enough for practice implementation.
Another approach to solve the problem of deconvolution relied on mathematical morphology. This approach was proposed and developed by many authors [1637-1642] beginning from works of Gallarda and Jain [1635] and Pingali and Jain [1636]. It is applicable to general shapes (any tip and sample which can be expressed as an array of heights in the usual fashion), and does not require numerical derivatives.
These methods have one point in common - it is necessary beforehand to estimate tip geometry in order to perform proper deconvolution procedure thereafter. One of the most popular methods for tip shape and size determination is based upon so-called tip characterizers, which are the features of well-defined geometry at nanoscale. Characterizers may be highly ordered edges of crystal facets (SrTiO3 [1603], MgO and NaCl [1604]), nanoparticles of well-defined spherical form [1605, 1607], sputtered cones [51] or nanoparticles [27] of InP, spike-like features in hydrothermally deposited ZnO films [268], macromolecules [788, 1455] and many others [E010]. Also specially designed calibration gratings can serve as tip characterizers. After computer analysis of obtained scans one can restore the tip shape and at the same time deduce what kind of defect tip does contain.
Alternative widely used approach for tip shape determination has come to be known as "blind reconstruction". The term "blind" means that there is no need in a priory knowledge of the exact characterizer's actual geometry. Since the publication of principles of general blind reconstruction by Villarrubia [1639] equivalent or similar methods independently were discovered later [1643, 1644]. The algorithms of blind reconstruction were published in [1645] and a speedier version was described and tested in [1646]. It was experimentally verified to work in a comparison between blind reconstruction of a tip and an independent method [1647]. Recently Todd and Eppell reported the improvement of this method in respect to spatially anisotropic noise which generally takes place at nanoscale and introduces an error in tip geometry determination [801]. The latest advances in evaluation of tip performance in blind reconstruction method can be found in papers of Nie et al. [1654, 1656].
Another modern technique developed by S. Xu et al. [23] is called nanografting. It based on subsequent imaging of thiol self-assembled monolayer. Authors state that this method features simplicity, high speed and the ability to characterize the very top portion of the tip. Moreover, tips with multiple asperities, which are difficult to investigate using other approaches, can be easily identified and characterized via nanografting.
We should express special thanks to John Villarrubia from National Institute of Standards and Technology (Gaithersburg, MD, USA) for constructive discussion on the content of this paragraph.
| ID |
Reference list (newly come references are marked red) |
| 13 |
Effect of tip morphology on AFM images
S.H. Ke, T. Uda, I. Stich, K. Terakura
Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing, 72 (2001), S63-S66
|
| 17 |
Forces with submolecular resolution between the probing tip
and Cu-TBPP molecules on Cu(100) observed with a combined AFM/STM
Ch. Loppacher, M. Bammerlin, M. Guggisberg, E. Meyer, H.-J. Guntherodt,
R. Luthi, R. Schlittler, J.K. Gimzewski
Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing, 72 (2001), S105-S108
|
| 21 |
Influence of tip size on AFM roughness measurements
D.L. Sedin, K.L. Rowlen
Applied Surface Science, 182 (2001), 1-2, 40-48 |
| 23 |
Characterization of AFM tips using nanografting
S. Xu, N.A. Amro, G.-Y. Liu
Applied Surface Science, 175-176 (2001), 649-655 |
| 27 |
Evaluation of AFM tips using nanometer-sized structures induced
by ion sputtering
F. Frost, D. Hirsch, A. Schindler
Applied Surface Science, 179 (2001), 1-4, 8-12 |
| 30 |
Simulated nc-AFM images of Si(001) surface with nanotube
tip
K. Tagami, N. Sasaki, M. Tsukada
Applied Surface Science, 172 (2001), 3-4, 301-306 |
| 47 |
Theory for the effect of the tip-surface interaction potential
on atomic resolution in forced vibration system of noncontact AFM
N. Sasaki, M. Tsukada
Applied Surface Science, 140 (1999), 3-4, 339-343 |
| 51 |
Cones formed during sputtering of InP and their use in defining
AFM tip shapes
M.P. Seah, J.E. Johnstone, S.J. Spencer, P.J. Cumpson
Applied Surface Science, 144-145 (1999), 151-155 |
| 78 |
Functionalization of carbon nanotube AFM probes using tip-activated
gases
A.T. Woolley, E. Joselevich, C.M. Lieber, S.S. Wong
Chemical Physics Letters, 306 (1999), 5-6, 219-225 |
| 82 |
Intrinsic stress measured on ultra-thin amorphous carbon
films deposited on AFM cantilevers
P. Lemoine, J.F. Zhao, A. Bell, P. Maguire, J. McLaughlin
Diamond and Related Materials, 10 (2001), 1, 94-98 |
| 85 |
Characterization of AFM cantilevers coated with diamond-like
carbon
M.C. Salvadori, M.C. Fritz, C. Carraro, R. Maboudian, O.R. Monteiro, I.G.
Brown
Diamond and Related Materials, 10 (2001), 12, 2190-2194 |
| 132 |
Sizes correction on AFM images of nanometer spherical particles
De-Quan Yang, Yu-Qing Xiong, Yun Guo, Da-An Da, Wei-Gang Lu
Journal of Materials Science (full set), 36 (2000), 1, pp. 263-267 |
| 153 |
Multifunctional AFM/SNOM Cantilever Probes: Fabrication and
Measurements
M. Stopka, D. Drews, K. Mayr, M. Lacher, W. Ehrfeld, T. Kalkbrenner, M.
Graf, V. Sandoghdar, J. Mlynek Microelectronic Engineering, 53 (2000),
1-4, 183-186 |
| 157 |
Integrating diamond pyramids into metal cantilevers and using
them as electrical AFM probes
T. Hantschel, S. Slesazeck, P. Niedermann, P. Eyben, W. Vandervorst
Microelectronic Engineering, 57-58 (2001), 749-754 |
| 160 |
Piezoresistive sensors on AFM cantilevers with atomic resolution
R. Jumpertz, O. Ohlsson, A.v.d. Hart, J. Schelten, F. Saurenbach
Microelectronic Engineering, 41-42 (1998), 441-444 |
| 161 |
Fabrication of Multipurpose AFM/SCM/SEP Microprobe with Integrated
Piezoresistive Deflection Sensor and Isolated Conductive Tip
P. Hudek, P. Grabiec, F. Shi, T. Gotszalk, I.W. Rangelow, P. Dumania
Microelectronic Engineering, 41-42 (1998), 477-480 |
| 163 |
6.6 MHz silicon AFM cantilever for high-speed readout in
AFM-based recording
K. Itoh, H. Koyanagi, K. Etoh, S. Hosaka, A. Kikukawa
Microelectronic Engineering, 46 (1999), 1-4, 109-112 |
| 164 |
Tip-on-tip: a novel AFM tip configuration for the electrical
characterization of semiconductor devices
W. Kulisch, W. Vandervorst, T. Hantschel, T. Trenkler, A. Malave, D. Buchel,
E. Oesterschulze
Microelectronic Engineering, 46 (1999), 1-4, 113-116 |
| 184 |
First AFM observation of thin cermet films close to the percolation
threshold using a conducting tip
M. Gadenne, P. Gadenne, O. Schneegans, F. Houze, P. Chretien, C. Desmarest,
J. Sztern
Physica B: Condensed Matter, 279 (2000), 1-3, 94-97 |
| 210 |
Fabrication and characterization of cantilevers with integrated
sharp tips and piezoelectric elements for actuation and detection for parallel
AFM applications
N.F. De Rooij, G. Schurmann, G.-A. Racine, P.-F. Indermuhle
Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 60 (1997), 1-3, 186-190 |
| 211 |
Piezoresistive silicon V-AFM cantilevers for high-speed imaging
A.G.R. Evans, A. Brunnschweiler, G. Ensell, Y. Su
Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 76 (1999), 1-3, 139-144 |
| 213 |
AFM imaging with an xy-micropositioner with integrated tip
P.-F. Indermuhle, V.P. Jaecklin, J. Brugger, C. Linder, N.F. De Rooij, M.
Binggeli
Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 47 (1995), 1-3, 562-565 |
| 214 |
Modular design of AFM probe with sputtered silicon tip
P.A. Rasmussen, J. Thaysen, S. Bouwstra, A. Boisen
Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 92 (2001), 1-3, 96-101 |
| 220 |
Structuring of mica surfaces with a vibrating AFM tip
J. Kuppers, T. Schimmel, R. Kladny, V. Popp
Surface Science, 401 (1998), 1, 105-111 |
| 227 |
Current-dependent growth of silicon nitride lines using a
conducting tip AFM
D. Sarid, C.A. Peterson, R.K. Workman
Surface Science, 423 (1999), 2-3, L277-L279 |
| 237 |
Direct imaging of the tip shape by AFM.
A. Baiker, F. Atamny
Surface Science, 323 (1995), 3, l314-l318 |
| 243 |
Simulation of interaction force between Si tip and Si(111)3x3-Ag
surface of IET structure in noncontact AFM
N. Sasaki, S. Watanabe, H. Aizawa, M. Tsukada
Surface Science, 493 (2001), 1-3, 188-193 |
| 268 |
Characterization of atomic force microscopy (AFM) tip shapes
by scanning hydrothermally deposited ZnO thin films
G.W. Bao, S.F.Y. Li
Talanta, 45 (1998), 4, 751-757 |
| 270 |
A tower-shaped prototypic molecule designed as an atomically
sharp tip for AFM applications
A.V. Rukavishnikov, M.D. Lee, A. Phadke, D.H. LaMunyo, P.A. Petukov,
J.F. Keana
Tetrahedron Letters, 40 (1999), 35, 6353-6356 |
| 282 |
AFM for the imaging of large and steep submicroscopic features,
artifacts and scraping with asymmetric cantilever tips
G. Kaupp, J. Schmeyers, U. Pogodda, M. Haak, T. Marquardt, M. Plagmann
Thin Solid Films, 264 (1995), 2, 205-211 |
| 332 |
Application of the needle sensor for microstructure measurements
and atomic force microscopy
U. Grunewald, K. Bartzke, T. Antrack
Thin Solid Films, 264 (1995), 2, pp. 169-171 |
| 390 |
Atomic force microscopy probe with piezoresistive read-out
and a highly symmetrical Wheatstone bridge arrangement
J. Thaysen, A. Boisen, O. Hansen, S. Bouwstra
Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 83 (2000), 1-3, 47-53 |
| 451 |
Chemical bonds studied with functionalized atomic force microscopy
tips
T. Han, J.M. Williams, T.P. Beebe
Analytica Chimica Acta, 307 (1995), 2-3, 365-376 |
| 487 |
Effect of tip sharpness on the relative contributions of
attractive and repulsive forces in the phase imaging of tapping mode atomic
force microscopy
M.-H. Whangbo, R. Brandsch, G. Bar
Surface Science, 422 (1999), 1-3, L192-L199 |
| 519 |
Harmonic responses of a cantilever interacting with elastomers
in tapping mode atomic force microscopy
M.-H. Whangbo, G. Bar, R. Brandsch, L. Delineau
Surface Science, 448 (2000), 1, L179-L187 |
| 537 |
Imaging silicon by atomic force microscopy with crystallographically
oriented tips
F.J. Giessibl, S. Hembacher, H. Bielefeldt, J. Mannhart
Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing, 72 (2001), 7,
S15-S17 |
| 581 |
Lead zirconate titanate cantilever for noncontact atomic
force microscopy
T. Fujii, Y. Miyahara, H. Bleuler, H. Yamada, A. Tonoli, S. Watanabe, S.
Carabelli
Applied Surface Science, 140 (1999), 3-4, 428-431 |
| 602 |
Micromachining of diamond probes for atomic force microscopy
applications
K. Unno, T. Shibata, E. Makino
Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 88 (2001), 3, 247-255 |
| 642 |
Non-contact atomic force microscopy of an antiferromagnetic
NiO(100) surface using a ferromagnetic tip
H. Hosoi, M. Kimura, K. Hayakawa, K. Sueoka, K. Mukasa
Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing, 72 (2001), 7,
S23-S26 |
| 698 |
Simulation of atomic force microscopy image variations due
to tip apex size: Appearance of half spots
M. Komiyama, K. Tazawa, K. Tsujimichi, A. Hirotani, M. Kubo, A. Miyamoto
Thin Solid Films, 281-282 (1996), 1-2, 580-583 |
| 756 |
The determination of the elastic modulus of microcantilever
beams using atomic force microscopy
B. T. Comella, M. R. Scanlon
Journal of Materials Science (full set), 35 (2000), 3, 567-572 |
| 788 |
Calibration of atomic force microscope tips using biomolecules
Thundat, T., Zheng, X. -Y., Sharp, S. L., Allison, D. P., Warmack, R. J.,
Joy, D. C. and Ferrell, T. L.
Scanning Microsc. 6 (1992), 903-910 |
| 801 |
A method to improve the quantitative analysis of SFM images
at the nanoscale
B.A. Todd, S.J. Eppell
Surface Science, 491 (2001), 3, 473-483 |
| 818 |
Carbon nanotubes as tips in non-contact SFM
V. Barwich, M. Bammerlin, A. Baratoff, R. Bennewitz, M. Guggisberg, C. Loppacher,
O. Pfeiffer, E. Meyer, H.-J. Guntherodt, J.-P. Salvetat, J.-M. Bonard, L.
Forro
Applied Surface Science, 157 (2000), 4, 269-273 |
| 837 |
Intercomparison of SEM, AFM, and Electrical Linewidths
J. S. Villarrubia, R. Dixson, S. Jones, J. R. Lowney, M. T. Postek, R. A.
Allen, and M. W. Cresswell
Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XIII,
Proc. SPIE 3677 (1999), pp. 587-598 . |
| 859 |
Lateral stiffness: A new nanomechanical measurement for the
determination of shear strengths with friction force microscopy
R. W. Carpick, D. F. Ogletree and M. Salmeron
Applied Physics Letters 70 (1997), 1548 |
| 860 |
Investigating the effects of silicon tip contamination in
noncontact scanning force microscopy (SFM)
A.S. Foster, P.V. Sushko, A.L. Shluger, L.N. Kantorovich
Applied Surface Science, 144-145 (1999), 608-612 |
| 870 |
Lithographically defined polymer tips for quartz tuning fork
based scanning force microscopes
T. Akiyama, U. Staufer, N.F. de Rooij, L. Howald, L. Scandella
Microelectronic Engineering, 57-58 (2001), 769-773 |
| 873 |
Magnetically refined tips for Scanning Force Microscopy
R. Jumpertz, P. Leinenbach, A.W.A. van der Hart, J. Schelten
Microelectronic Engineering, 35 (1997), 1-4, 325-328 |
| 878 |
Micromachined Si3N4-Tip on Cantilever
for Parallel SFM and NSOM Applications
S.S. Choi, M.Y. Jung, I.W. Lyo
Microelectronic Engineering, 46 (1999), 1-4, 427-430 |
| 886 |
Non-destructive imaging of delicate polymer surfaces using
scanning force microscopy tips modified with hydrophobic self-assembled
monolayers
G.J. Leggett, B.D. Beake
Polymer, 40 (1999), 21, 5973-5976 |
| 921 |
Self-excited force-sensing microcantilevers with piezoelectric
thin films for dynamic scanning force microscopy
T. Itoh, T. Suga
Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 54 (1996), 1-3, 477-481 |
| 922 |
Self-excited piezoelectric PZT microcantilevers for dynamic
SFM-with inherent sensing and actuating capabilities
T. Itoh, T. Suga, C. Lee
Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 72 (1999), 2, 179-188 |
| 933 |
Study of tip-sample interaction in scanning force microscopy
M. Luna, J. Colchero, J. Gomez-Herrero, A.M. Baro
Applied Surface Science, 157 (2000), 4, 285-289 |
| 943 |
Tapping-mode scanning force microscopy: Metallic tips and
samples
D. Sarid
Computational Materials Science, 5 (1996), 4, 291-297 |
| 972 |
Studies of vibrating atomic force microscope cantilevers
in liquid
Schaeffer T.E., Cleveland J.P., Ohnesorge F.M., Walters D.A., Hansma P.K.
J. Appl. Phys. 80 (1996), 3622-3627. |
| 974 |
Investigation of the image contrast of tapping-mode atomic
force microscopy using protein-modified cantilever tips
You H.X., Yu L.
Biophys. J. 73 (1997), 3299-3308. |
| 1007 |
Application of commercially available cantilevers in tuning
fork Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM) studies
S. Rozhok, V. Chandrasekhar
Solid State Communications, 121 (2002), 12, 683-686 |
| 1010 |
Artifacts in SPM measurements of thin films and coatings
T.G. Lenihan, A.P. Malshe, W.D. Brown, L.W. Schaper
Thin Solid Films, 270 (1995), 1-2, 356-361 |
| 1022 |
Fabrication of integrated diamond cantilevers with tips for
SPM applications
W. Kulisch, A. Malave, W. Scholz, C. Mihalcea, E. Oesterschulze, G. Lippold
Diamond and Related Materials, 6 (1997), 5-7, 906-911 |
| 1025 |
In situ scanning probe microscopy and new perspectives in
analytical chemistry
A.G. Hansen, A. Boisen, J.-D. Zhang, J.U. Nielsen, J.E.T. Andersen, J. Ulstrup,
H. Jensenius, E.P. Friis, Q. Chi
Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 18 (1999), 11, 665-674 |
| 1026 |
Indirect tip fabrication for Scanning Probe Microscopy
J.P. Rasmussen, O. Hansen, S. Bouwstra, A. Boisen
Microelectronic Engineering, 30 (1996), 1-4, 579-582 |
| 1033 |
Melnikov-Based Dynamical Analysis of Microcantilevers in
Scanning Probe Microscopy
M. Ashhab, M. V. Salapaka, M. Dahleh, I. Mezic
Nonlinear Dynamics, 20 (1999), 3, 197-220 |
| 1065 |
Spring constants of composite ceramic/gold cantilevers for
scanning probe microscopy
J.L. Hazel, V.V. Tsukruk
Thin Solid Films, 339 (1999), 1-2, 249-257 |
| 1105 |
Cantilever vibration control by electrostatic actuation for
magnetic force microscopy
M.J. Cunningham, D.F.L. Jenkins, M.A.H. Khalid
Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 63 (1997), 2, 125-128 |
| 1110 |
Description of magnetic force microscopy by three-dimensional
tip Green's function for sample magnetic charges
H. Saito, S. Ishio, J. Chen
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 191 (1999), 1-2, 153-161
|
| 1111 |
Development of high coercivity magnetic force microscopy
tips
S.H. Liou, Y.D. Yao
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 190 (1998), 1-2, 130-134
|
| 1117 |
Fabrication and characterization of advanced probes for magnetic
force microscopy
U. Hartmann, J. Schelten, P. Leinenbach, U. Memmert
Applied Surface Science, 144-145 (1999), 492-496 |
| 1122 |
Interactions between soft magnetic samples and MFM tips
S.L. Tomlinson, A.N. Farley, S.R. Hoon, M.S. Valera
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 157-158 (1996), 557-558
|
| 1123 |
Interpretation of low-coercivity tip response in MFM imaging
R. Street, D.L. Bradbury, L. Folks
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 177-181 (1998), 2002, 980-981
|
| 1126 |
Investigation of the response of a new amorphous ferromagnetic
MFM tip coating with an established sample and a prototype device
G.P. Heydon, W.M. Rainforth, M.R.J. Gibbs, H.A. Davies, J.E.L. Bishop, J.W.
Tucker, S. Huo, G. Pan, D.J. Mapps, W.W. Clegg
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 214 (2000), 3, 225-233 |
| 1176 |
Preparation and characterisation of a new amorphous tip coating
for application in magnetic force microscopy
H.A. Davies, S. McVitie, M.R.J. Gibbs, R.P. Ferrier, W.M. Rainforth, J.
Scott, G.P. Heydon, J.W. Tucker, J.E.L. Bishop
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 205 (1999), 2-3, 131-135
|
| 1181 |
Rapid biochemical detection and differentiation with magnetic
force microscope cantilever arrays
R.G. Rudnitsky, E.M. Chow, T.W. Kenny
Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 83 (2000), 1-3, 256-262 |
| 1205 |
Method for the calibration of atomic-force microscope cantilevers
J.E. Sader, I. Larson, P. Mulvaney and L.R. White
Rev. Sci. Instrum., 66 (1995) 3789-3798 |
| 1206 |
Calibration of rectangular atomic force microscope cantilevers
J.E. Sader, J.W.M. Chon and P. Mulvaney
Rev. Sci. Instrum., 70 (1999) 3967-3969 |
| 1210 |
Quality Factors in Micron- and Submicron-Thick Cantilevers
K. Y. Yasumura, T. D. Stowe, E. M. Chow, T. Pfafman, T. W. Kenny, B. C.
Stipe and D. Rugar
Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 9 (2000) 1, pp. 117-125
|
| 1211 |
Functionalization of scanning force microscopy cantilevers
via galvanic displacement technique
M. C. Fritz, C. Carraro and R. Maboudian
Tribology Letters, 11 (2001), 3-4, 171-175 |
| 1218 |
Lateral, normal, and longitudinal spring constants of atomic
force microscopy cantilevers
Neumeister, J. M. and W. A. Ducker
Rev. Sci. Instrum., 65 (1994), 8, 2527-2531 |
| 1281 |
Whisker probes
Givargizov E.I., Stepanova A.N.,Obolenskaya L.N.,Mashkova E.S., Molchanov
V.A.,Givargizov M.E., Rangelow I.
Ultramicroscopy, 82 (2000), p. 57-61 |
| 1300 |
A new calibration method of the lateral contact stiffness
and lateral force using modulated lateral force microscopy
O. Pietrement, J.L. Beaudoin, M. Troyon
Tribology Letters, 7 (1999), 4, 213-220 |
| 1308 |
Lateral force microscopy - A quantitative approach
C.T. Gibson, G.S. Watson, S. Myhra
Wear, 213 (1997), 1-2, pp. 72-79 |
| 1325 |
Carbon-nanotube tips for scanning probe microscopy: Preparation
by a controlled process and observation of deoxyribonucleic acid
H.Nishijima, S.Kamo, S.Akita, Y.Nakayama, K.I.Hohmura, S.H.Yoshimura,
K.Takeyasu
Appl. Phys. Lett. 74 (1999), 26, pp. 4061-4063 |
| 1328 |
Preparation of platinum iridium scanning probe microscopy
tips
A. H. Sorensen, U. Hvid, M. W. Mortensen, K. A. Morch
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70 (1999) 7, pp. 3059-3067 |
| 1336 |
Ultrasharp diamond-coated silicon tips for scanning-probe
devices
E. I. Givargizov, A.N. Stepanova, E. S. Mashkova, V. A. Molchanov, F. Shi,
P. Hudek and I. W. Rangelow
Microelectronic Engineering 41/42 (1998) 499-502 |
| 1341 |
Test structure for SPM tip shape deconvolution
V. Bykov, A. Gologanov, V. Shevyakov
Appl. Phys. A 66 (1998), 499-502 |
| 1358 |
Sensitivity of vibration modes of atomic force microscope
cantilevers in continuous surface contact
Win-Jin Chang
Nanotechnology 13 (2002) 510-514 |
| 1376 |
Optical interference artifacts in contact atomic force microscopy
images
A. Mendez-Vilas, M.L. Gonzalez-Martin and M.J. Nuevo
Ultramicroscopy, Vol. 92 (3-4) (2002) pp. 243-250 |
| 1378 |
A complementary-metal-oxide-semiconductor-field-effect-transistor-compatible
atomic force microscopy tip fabrication process and integrated atomic force
microscopy cantilevers fabricated with this process
Mizuki Ono, Dirk Lange, Oliver Brand, Christoph Hagleitner and Henry
Baltes
Ultramicroscopy, Vol. 91 (1-4) (2002) pp. 9-20 |
| 1379 |
Mapping of lateral vibration of the tip in atomic force microscopy
at the torsional resonance of the cantilever
Takayoshi Kawagishi, Atsushi Kato, Yasuo Hoshi and Hideki Kawakatsu
Ultramicroscopy, Vol. 91 (1-4) (2002) pp. 37-48 |
| 1380 |
Scanning probe microscopy installed with nanotube probes
and nanotube tweezers
Yoshikazu Nakayama
Ultramicroscopy, Vol. 91 (1-4) (2002) pp. 49-56 |
| 1381 |
Performance of the carbon nano-tube assembled tip for surface
shape characterization
M. Yasutake, Y. Shirakawabe, T. Okawa, S. Mizooka and Y. Nakayama
Ultramicroscopy, Vol. 91 (1-4) (2002) pp. 57-62 |
| 1382 |
Self-sensing piezoresistive cantilever and its magnetic force
microscopy applications
Hiroshi Takahashi, Kazunori Ando and Yoshiharu Shirakawabe
Ultramicroscopy, Vol. 91 (1-4) (2002) pp. 63-72 |
| 1437 |
Atomic Force Microscopy Cantilevers for Sensitive Lateral
Force Detection
M. Kageshima, H. Ogiso, S. Nakano, M. A. Lantzand and H. Tokumoto
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 38 (1999) 3958-3961 |
| 1441 |
Electrochemically etched nickel tips for spin polarized scanning
tunneling microscopy
Cavallini M. and Biscarini F.
Rev. Sci. Instrum., 71 (2000), 12, pp. 4457-4460 |
| 1442 |
Silicon Nitride Cantilevers with Oxidation-Sharpened Silicon
Tips for Atomic Force Microscopy
R. J. Grow, S. C. Minne, S. R. Manalis and C. F. Quate
Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 11 (2002) 4, pp. 317-321 |
| 1445 |
WS2 nanotubes as tips in scanning probe microscopy
A.Rothschild, S.R.Cohen, R.Tenne
Appl. Phys. Lett. 75 (1999), 25, pp. 4025-4027 |
| 1455 |
AFM structural study of the molecular chaperone GroEL and
its two-dimensional crystals: an ideal "living" calibration sample
F. Valle, J.A. DeRose, G. Dietler, M. Kawe, A. Plückthun and G. Semenza
Ultramicroscopy, Vol. 93 (1) (2002) pp. 83-89 |
| 1456 |
Atomic force microscopy using single-wall C nanotube probes
E. S. Snow, P. M. Campbell, and J. P. Novak
J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B 20, 2002, 822 |
| 1464 |
Terabit-per-square-inch data storage with the atomic force
microscope
E. B. Cooper, S. R. Manalis, H. Fang, H. Dai, K. Matsumoto, S. C. Minne,
T. Hunt, and C. F. Quate
Appl. Phys. Lett. 75 (1999), 22, 3566-3568 |
| 1578 |
Fast imaging and fast force spectroscopy of single biopolymers
with a new atomic force microscope designed for small cantilevers
Viani, M. B., T. E. Schaeffer, G. T. Paloczi, L. I. Pietrasanta, B. L. Smith,
J. B. Thompson, M. Richter, M. Rief, H. E. Gaub, K. W. Plaxco, A. N. Cleland,
H. G. Hansma, and P. K. Hansma.
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70 (1999), 4300-4303. |
| 1603 |
Mesoscopic Calibration of an Atomic Force Microscope
S.S. Sheiko, M. Möller, E.M.C.M. Reuvekamp and H.W. Zandbergen
Ultramicroscopy 53 (1994) 371-380 |
| 1604 |
Determining the form of atomic force microscope tips
P. Siedle, H-J. Butt. E.Bamberg, D.N. Wang, W. Kuhlbrand, J. Zach and
M. Haider
Int. Phys. Conf. Ser. 130 (1993) 361 |
| 1605 |
Calibration of the scanning (atomic) force microscope with
gold particles
S.Xu and M.F.Arnsdorf
J. Microsc. 173 (1994) 199 |
| 1606 |
CVD diamond probes for nanotechnology
P. Niedermann, W. Hanni, D. Morel, A. Perret, N. Skinner, P.-F. Indermuhle,
N.-F. de Rooij , P.-A. Buffat
Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing, 66 (1998), 7,
S31-S34 |
| 1607 |
Tip Characterization from AFM Images of Nanometric Spherical
Particles
Ramirez-Aguilar, K. A.; Rowlen, K. L.
Langmuir, 14 (1998), 2562-2566 |
| 1608 |
Tip shape effects in scanning probe metrology
R. Cottle
Proc. SPIE, Vol. 4562 (2002), p. 247-255 |
| 1609 |
Fabrication of monolithic diamond probes for scanning probe
microscopy applications
Scholz, Wenzel; Albert, D.; Malave, A.; Werner, Stephfan; Mihalcea, Christopher;
Kulisch, W.;Oesterschulze, Egbert
Proc. SPIE Vol. 3009 (1997), p. 61-71 |
| 1610 |
Sharpened carbon nanotube probes
Moloni, Katerina; Lal, Amit; Lagally, Max G.
Proc. SPIE Vol. 4098 (2000), p. 76-83 |
| 1611 |
Electric force microscopy with a single carbon nanotube tip
Dagata, John A.; Chien, F. S.; Gwo, S.; Morimoto, K.; Inoue, Takahito; Itoh,
J.; Yokoyama, Hiroshi
Proc. SPIE Vol. 4344 (2001) p. 58-71 |
| 1612 |
Using carbon nanotube cantilevers in scanning probe metrology
R. Schlaf, Y. Emirov, J.A. Bieber, A. Sikder, J. Kohlscheen, D.A. Walters,
M.R. Islam, B. Metha, Z. F. Ren, T.L. Shofner, B.B. Rossie, M.W. Cresswell
Proc. SPIE Vol 4689 (2002), (in print) |
| 1613 |
Carbon nanotubes as probes for atomic force microscopy
R. M. D. Stevens, N. A. Frederick, B. L. Smith, D. E. Morse, G. D. Stucky
and P. K. Hansma
Nanotechnology 11 (2000), 1-5 |
| 1614 |
Carbon nanotube tips - high-resolution probes for imaging
biological systems
S.S. Wong, J.D. Harper, P.T. Lansbury Jr., C.M. Lieber
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 1998, 603-604 |
| 1615 |
Single-walled carbon nanostructure probes for high-resolution
nanostructure imaging
S.S. Wong, A.T. Woolley, T.W. Odom, J.-L. Huang, P. Kim, D.V. Vezenov, C.M.
Lieber
Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 1998, 3465-3467 |
| 1616 |
Growth of nanotubes for probe microscopy tips
J. H. Hafner, C. L. Cheung, and C. M. Lieber
Nature, 398 (1999) N6730, 761 |
| 1617 |
Nanotube as Nanoprobes in Scanning Probe Microscopy
Dai, H.; Hafner, J. H.; Rinzler, A. G.; Colbert, D. T.; Smalley, R. E.
Nature, 384 (1996), 147 |
| 1618 |
Structural and Functional Imaging with Nanotube AFM probes
Hafner, J. H.; Cheung, C. L.; Woolley, A. T.; Lieber, C. M.
Progress in Biophysics and Molcular Biology, 77 (2001), pp. 73 |
| 1619 |
Exploiting the properties of carbon nanotubes for nanolithography
H. Dai, N. Franklin, and J. Han
Appl. Phys. Lett. 73 (1998), 1508-1510 |
| 1620 |
High-Yield Assembly of Individual Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube
Tips for Scanning
Probe Microscopies
Jason H. Hafner, Chin-Li Cheung, Tjerk H. Oosterkamp, and Charles M. Lieber
J. Phys. Chem. B 105 (2001) 4, 743-746 |
| 1621 |
Calibration of the Torsional Spring Constant and the Lateral
Photodiode Response of Friction Force Microscopes
A. Feiler, P. Attard, I. Larson
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71 (2000), 2746-2750 |
| 1622 |
Stability of thiol-immobilized DNA on microcantilever sensors
K.A. Stevenson, A. Mehta, K.M. Hansen and T.G. Thundat
Proc. ESC 201 Meeting - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, May 12-17 (2002)
|
| 1623 |
In situ detection of calcium ions with chemically modified
microcantilevers
H.-F. Ji and T. G. Thundat
Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 2002, 17, 337-343 |
| 1624 |
Ultrasensitive Detection of Trace CrO42-
Using a Microcantilever sensors
H.-F. Ji, T. Thundat, R. Dabestani, G. M. Brown, P. F. Britt, and P. Bonnesson
Anal. Chem. 2001, 73(7), 1572-1576 |
| 1625 |
Nanomechanical Signatures of Biomolecular Recognition and
Interactions
G. Wu, H. -F. Ji, K. Hansen, T. Thundat, R. Datar, R. Cote, M. F. Hagan,
A. K. Chakraborty, and A. Majumdar
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2001, 98, 1560-1564 |
| 1626 |
Cantilever-based optical deflection assay for discrimination
of DNA single nucleotide mismatches
K. M. Hansen, H.-F. Ji, G. Wu, R. Datar, R. Cote, A. Majumdar, T. Thundat
Anal. Chem., 2001, 73(7), 1567-1571 |
| 1627 |
Detection of pH variation Using Modified Microcantilever
Sensors
H.-F. Ji, K. M. Hansen, Z. Hu, T. Thundat
Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 72 (2001), 233-238 |
| 1628 |
A Novel Self-Assembled Monolayer Coated Microcantilever for
Low Level Cesium Detection
H. F. Ji, R. Dabestani, E. Finot, T. Thundat, G. M. Brown and P. F. Britt
Chem. Commun., 2000, 457 |
| 1629 |
Highly Selective Microcantilever Sensor for Cesium Ion Detection
T. Thundat, E. Finot, H.-F. Ji, R. Dabestani, P.F. Britt, P. V. Bonnesen,
G. M. Brown, R. J. Warmack
Proc. Electrochem. Soc., 1999, 99-23, 314-319 |
| 1630 |
In-situ Detection of DNA hybridization using Browninan Motion
of Microcantilevers
H.-F. Ji, K. M. Hansen, T. Thundat, G. Wu, A. Majumdar, R. Datar, and R.
Cote
Submitted to Anal. Chem. |
| 1631 |
Ultrasensitive Detection of Hg2+ Using Microcantilever
Sensors
X. Xu, T. Thundat, G. M. Brown, and H. F. Ji
Submitted for publication. |
| 1633 |
Scanning tunneling microscopy on rough surfaces-deconvolution
of constant current images
G. Reiss, F. Schneider, J. Vancea, and H. Hoffmann
Appl. Phys. Lett. 57 (1990), 867 |
| 1634 |
Reconstruction of STM and AFM images distorted by finite-size
tips
D. Keller
Surf. Sci. 253 (1991), 353 |
| 1635 |
Computational model of the imaging process in scanning-x
microscopy
H. Gallarda and R. Jain
Proceedings of Conference on Integrated Circuit Metrology, Inspection, and
Process Control, V, SPIE Vol. 1464 (1991), 459 |
| 1636 |
Restoration of scanning probe microscope images
G. S. Pingali and R. Jain
Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision, (1992)
pp. 282-289 |
| 1637 |
Envelope reconstruction of probe microscope images
D. J. Keller and F. S. Franke
Surf. Sci. 294 (1993), 409 |
| 1638 |
Atomic-force microscopy probe tip visualization and improvement
of images using a simple deconvolution procedure
P. Markiewicz and M. C. Goh
Langmuir 10 (1994), 5 |
| 1639 |
Morphological estimation of tip geometry for scanned probe
microscopy
J. S. Villarrubia
Surf. Sci. 321 (1994), 287 |
| 1640 |
A mathematical morphology approach to image-formation and
image-restoreation in scanning tunneling and atomic-force microscopies
N. Bonnet, S. Dongmo, P. Vautrot, and M. Troyon
Microsc. Microanal. Microstruct. 5 (1994), 477 |
| 1641 |
Morphological restoration of atomic-force microscopy images
D. L. Wilson, K. S. Kump, S. J. Eppell, and R. E. Marchant
Langmuir 11 (1995), 265 |
| 1642 |
Scanned probe microscope tip characterization without calibrated
tip characterizers
J. S. Villarrubia
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. 14 (1996), 1518 |
| 1643 |
Blind restoration method of scanning tunneling and atomic
force microscopy images
S. Dongmo, M. Troyon, P. Vautrot, E. Delain, and N. Bonnet
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 14 (1996), 1552 |
| 1644 |
Blind reconstruction of scanning probe image data
P. M. Williams, K. M. Shakesheff, M. C. Davies, D. E. Jackson, C. J. Roberts,
and S. J. B. Tendler
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 14 (1996), 1557 |
| 1645 |
Algorithms for scanned probe microscope image simulation,
surface reconstruction, and tip estimation
J. S. Villarrubia
J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 102 (1997), 4, 425-454 |
| 1646 |
A strategy for faster blind reconstruction of tip geometry
for scanned probe microscopy
J. S. Villarrubia
Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XII,
Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 3332 (1998), 10 |
| 1647 |
Experimental Test of Blind Tip Reconstruction for Scanning
Probe Microscopy
S. Dongmo, J. S. Villarrubia, S. N. Jones, T. B. Renegar, M. T. Postek,
and J. F. Song
Ultramicroscopy 85 (2000) 3, pp. 141-153 |
| 1649 |
Micromachined silicon cantilever beams for thin-film stress
measurement
G.F. Cardinale, D.G. Howitt, W.M. Clift, K.F. McCarty, D.L. Medlin, P.B.Mirkarimi,
N.R. Moody
Thin Solid Films 287 (1996), 214-219 |
| 1246 |
Frequency shifts of cantilevers vibrating in various media
Stefan Weigert, Markus Dreier and Martin Hegner
Appl. Phys. Lett. 69 (1996) 19, pp. 2834-2836 |
| 1247 |
Carbon nanotube-modified cantilevers for improved spatial
resolution in electrostatic force microscopy
S. B. Arnason, A. G. Rinzler, Q. Hudspeth, and A. F. Hebard
Appl. Phys. Lett. 75 (1999), 18, 2842-2844 |
| 1266 |
Evaluating probes for "electrical" atomic force microscopy
T. Trenkler, T. Hantschel, R. Stephenson, P. De Wolf, W. Vandervorst, L.
Hellemans, A. Malave, D. Buchel, E. Oesterschulze, W. Kulisch, P. Niedermann,
T. Sulzbach, and O. Ohlsson
J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B18 (2000), 1, pp. 418-427 |
| 1286 |
Frequency response of cantilever beams immersed in viscous
fluids with applications to the atomic force microscope
John Elie Sader
J. Appl. Phys. 84 (1998) 1, pp. 64-76 |
| 1654 |
Use of biaxially-oriented polypropylene film for evaluating
and cleaning contaminated atomic force microscopy probe tips: an application
to blind tip reconstruction
H.-Y. Nie, M.J. Walzak and N.S. McIntyre
Rev. Sci. Instrum., 73 (2002), pp. 3831-3836 |
| 1656 |
A simple and effective method of evaluating atomic force
microscopy tip performance
H.-Y. Nie and N.S. McIntyre
Langmuir 17 (2001), pp. 432-436 |
| 1687 |
Chemically-Specific Probes for the Atomic Force Microscope
G. U. Lee, L. A. Chrisey, C. E. O'ferral, D. E. Pilloff, N. H. Turner, and
R. J. Colton
Israel J. Chem. 36 (1996), pp. 81-87 |
| 1998 |
Cantilevers and tips for atomic force microscopy
M. Tortonese
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag, 16 (1997) 2, 28-33 |
| 1827 |
Growth of tungsten carbide nano-needle and its application
as a scanning tunnelling microscope tip
T. Arie, S. Akita, and Y. Nakayama
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 31 (1998) L49-51 |
| 1878 |
AFM tips: how sharp are they?
S. Sheng, D. M. Czajkowsky, Z. Shao
J. Microsc., 196 (1999) 1, 1-5 |
| 1824 |
Carbon nanotube tips for a scanning probe microscope: their
fabrication and properties
S. Akita, H. Nishijima, Y. Nakayama, F. Tokumasu, and K.Takeyasu
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 32 (1999) 9, 1044-1048 |
| 2357 |
Quality assessment of atomic force microscopy probes by scanning
electron microscopy: correlation of tip structure with rendered images
D. J. Taatjes, A. S. Quinn, M. R. Lewis, E. G. Bovill
Microsc. Res. Tech., 44 (1999) 5, 312-326 |
| 2380 |
Scanning electron microscopy studies of protein-functionalized
atomic force microscopy cantilever tips
M. Micic, A. Chen, R. M. Leblanc, V. T. Moy
Scanning, 21 (1999) 6, 394-397 |
| 1862 |
Adhesion artefacts in atomic force microscopy imaging
J. I. Paredes, A. Martinez-Alonso, J. M. Tascon
J. Microsc., 200 (2000) 2, 109-113 |
| 1823 |
Atomic force microscopy of single-walled carbon nanotubes
using carbon nanotube tip
N. Choi, T. Uchihashi, H. Nishijima, T. Ishida, W. Mizutani, S. Akita,
Y. Nakayama, M. Ishikawa and H. Tokumoto
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 39 (2000) 6B, 3707-3710 |
| 1825 |
Carbon-nanotube probe equipped magnetic force microscope
T. Arie, H. Nishijima, S. Akita and Y. Nakayama
J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B18 (2000) 1, 104-106 |
| 2047 |
Comprehensive surface analysis of hydrophobically functionalized
SFM tips
R. Luginbuhl, A. Szuchmacher, M. D. Garrison, J. B. Lhoest, R. M. Overney,
B. D. Ratner
Ultramicroscopy, 82 (2000) 1-4, 171-179 |
| 2143 |
Force Calibration in Lateral Force Microscopy
R. G. Cain, S. Biggs, N. W. Page
J. Colloid. Interface. Sci., 227 (2000) 1, 55-65 |
| 1829 |
Influence of stiffness of carbon-nanotube probes in atomic
force microscopy
S. Akita, H. Nishijima and Y. Nakayama
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 33 (2000) 2673-2677 |
| 2281 |
Microfabrication of a combined AFM-SNOM sensor
G. Schurmann, W. Noell, U. Staufer, N. F. de Rooij
Ultramicroscopy, 82 (2000) 1-4, 33-38 |
| 1831 |
Microprocess for fabricating carbon-nanotube probes of a
scanning probe microscope
Y. Nakayama, H. Nishijima, S. Akita, K. I. Hohmura, S. H. Yoshimura
and K. Takeyasu
J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B18 (2000) 2, 661-664 |
| 2340 |
Piezoresistive sensors for scanning probe microscopy
T. Gotszalk, P. Grabiec, I. W. Rangelow
Ultramicroscopy, 82 (2000) 1-4, 39-48 |
| 2200 |
Implementation of self-sensing SPM cantilevers for nano-force
measurement in microrobotics
S. Fahlbusch, S. Fatikow
Ultramicroscopy, 86 (2001) 1-2, 181-190 |
| 2217 |
Integrating an ultramicroelectrode in an AFM cantilever:
combined technology for enhanced information
C. Kranz, G. Friedbacher, B. Mizaikoff, A. Lugstein, J. Smoliner, E.
Bertagnolli
Anal. Chem., 73 (2001) 11, 2491-2500 |
| 2291 |
Modeling of cylindrically tapered cantilevers for transverse
dynamic force microscopy (TDFM)
M. Antognozzi, D. R. Binger, A. D. Humphris, P. J. James, M. J. Miles
Ultramicroscopy, 86 (2001) 1-2, 223-232 |
| 1835 |
Quantitative Analysis of the Magnetic Properties of a Carbon
Nanotube Probe in Magnetic Force Microscopy
T. Arie, N. Yoshida, S. Akita and Y. Nakayama
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 34 (2001) L43-L45 |
| 1836 |
Reduction of Long-range Interactions using Carbon Nanotube
Probes in Biological Systems
Y. Maeda, H. Nishijima, S. Akita, T. Matsumoto, Y. Nakayama and T. Kawai
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 40 (2001) 1425-1428 |
| 2506 |
Thermomechanical noise of a free v-shaped cantilever for
atomic-force microscopy
R. W. Stark, T. Drobek, W. M. Heckl
Ultramicroscopy, 86 (2001) 1-2, 207-215 |
| 2622 |
Susceptibility of atomic force microscope cantilevers to lateral forces
J.E. Sader
Rev. Sci. Instrum., 74 (2003) 4, 2438-2443 |
| 2626 |
Accurate analytical measurements in the atomic force microscope:
a microfabricated spring constant standard potentially traceable to the
SI
Peter J. Cumpson and John Hedley
Nanotechnology, 14 (2003) 1279-1288 |
| 2641 |
Scanning Force Microscopy - Calibrative Procedures for "Best Practice"
C. T. Gibson, G. S. Watson, S. Myhra
Scanning, 19 (1997) 564-581 |
| 2704 |
Nanometer-scale scanning sensors fabricated using stencil lithography
A. R. Champagne, A. J. Couture, F. Kuemmeth, and D. C. Ralph
Appl. Phys. Lett., 82 (2003) 7, 1111-1113 |
| 2800 |
E2382-04 Guide to Scanner and Tip Related Artifacts in Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and Atomic Force Microscopy
ASTM Annual Books of Standards, vol. 03.06 (2004) |
| 2801 |
E1813-96 Standard Practice for Measuring and Reporting Probe Tip Shape in Scanning Probe Microscopy
ASTM Annual Books of Standards, vol. 03.06 (2002) |
| E008 |
http://web.mit.edu/cortiz/www/spring.html |
| E009 |
Facile Convergent Route to Molecular Caltrops
Yao Y., Tour J.M.
J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 1968-1971 |
| E010 |
http://www.weizmann.ac.il/surflab/peter/standard/ |
| E011 |
http://www.surface-tec.com/pdf_files/cantilever.PDF |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|




|